At this time of year, some of my friends start behaving strangely: they have terrible mood swings, one moment singing bawdily, the next moment heads bowed, disconsolate. Their speech changes too—the accents become more Cockney, Yorkshire or Mancunian depending on where they're from, and they start shouting gibberish such as "kerm onnnn!" or using odd phrases like "the mercurial Ukrainian" or "at the end of the day."
For a moment I think it might be some sort of recurring venereal disease, but then I realise it's the start of the football season. As a non-football fan, it's interesting to see how, when talking about football, normal people start to use a different language—both verbal and physical. Football isn't an especially complicated game; I know how to play it badly and I can understand the offside rule. But there is a shared culture that the more you get to know the game, the more you understand.
Sport fans in particular revel in the specialist vocabulary of their game of choice. Watching alien games like American football, it's almost as if they're speaking an entirely different language: "scrimmage," "passing pocket" and, most terrifying of all, a "smashmouth offense." The mind boggles!
In contrast, wine with its "long finishes," "lovely legs" and "minerality" seems relatively straightforward. Yet people are afraid of wine talk. They're afraid of looking pretentious or appearing ignorant. There are complaints if you say "palate" instead of "taste" or "aroma" instead of "smell." That's understandable amongst non-wine-bore friends, nobody wants an amateur hour Robert Parker at a dinner party, but what I do find odd is that many within the wine business are afraid of it. Wine merchants, journalists and sommeliers fall over themselves to say that wine should be as accessible as possible. “There’s no right or wrong answer” repeated like grace before every tasting. Nobody wants to look like a snob.
But wine talk can function in exactly the same way as football talk: to show belonging, to share knowledge, to boast and, yes, sometimes to feel better than other people because your team won. Or you correctly guessed a wine was Breaky Bottom when someone gave you a glass to taste blind—as happened to me recently.
Some of this will be by its very nature exclusionary. As someone whose football talk begins and ends with Gazza crying at Italia ‘90, I accept that I’m not going to be accepted into that tribe. You can't have a club if everyone is a member, just as you can't support every team. It can all be a bit intimidating at first. For anyone seeking to gain entry to a slightly arcane field, that is part of the fun. Your first day at the Games Workshop was probably a bit nerve-racking too. I don't know because I was too busy smoking and trying to talk to girls.
Angling, motor racing, cooking (pan-fried, reduction, using the word "plate" as a verb) have their own jargon, yet no one thinks that they're snobbish. If you're interested in something, then be prepared to learn. Once you get to a certain level, wine's very complexity becomes an appeal.
Wine is a language and a difficult one at that. It requires study, practice and confidence. Despite over 25 years of semi-serious wine appreciation, I still feel incredibly ignorant when sitting next to Oz Clarke or Jancis Robinson, but again the nerves are part of the fun. Yes, you'll feel like a dick when you first say "on the nose" or "well-integrated tannins," just as lisping all those 'c's in Castilian makes you feel like an effete, inbred Habsburg. With practice, it will become second nature and the word Cenicero (a town in Rioja) will dance off your tongue.
Of course, wine has the added problem of class. Traditionally in Britain and the US it was drunk by the elites while the rest of us had gruel. But this hasn’t been true for 30 years or more. Wine has been a more-or-less democratic drink since at least the 1990s and yet our perceptions are stuck in the 1970s. Despite the enduring stereotype of the red-trousered middle aged wine bore called something like Jasper or Rupert, the leading wine writers, buyers, and winemakers today are often women and have been for years. See my article on Jane MacQuitty.
Wine isn't going to throw its snobbish connotations off by pretending it's simple or by—dread word—"demystifying." It will do so by confidently asserting its complexity. In fact, those arcane rituals, the decanting, the right glasses, the passing the port to the left (or is it the right?), are part of the fun.
They also serve an important role. As the ancient Greeks understood with their symposiums, these rituals aren't solely about elitism; they create a formalised and relatively safe way of consuming what can be a dangerous intoxicant. That’s one thing that the wine trade never shouts about (for legal reasons, probably). At the end of the day, slipping a bit of football talk in there, wine tasting is just a way of getting drunk in a slow, ritualised way.
Having a specific vocabulary doesn’t make something snobbish by default. Wine’s reputation for snobbery comes less from the language itself and more from the people who act as gatekeepers.
But it’s easier to say “let’s make wine more accessible” or the dreaded "let's demystify wine" than it is to actually address those gatekeepers.
Yes, the other hobbies you mentioned, like fishing or cooking, have their jargon and, like anything, have their own gatekeepers, but their culture as a whole tends to be more welcoming. If you walk into a tackle shop as a beginner, someone will probably help you get set up because they’re excited you’ve joined their world, and they want you to be safe and respectful in those fishing spots. Not knowing the terms right away doesn't stop people from getting started in the same way that wine does.
Cooking is something almost everyone does, so the learning curve feels more... democratic, I guess? Even motorsports, which has steep cost barriers for participation, is mostly consumed as a spectator sport, so you can generally pick up the language privately without much risk of embarrassment.
Wine is everywhere, but when someone wants to move from casual enjoyment to actually learning, the reception can still be condescending. I think that’s why the accessibility conversation persists here in a way it doesn’t in those other industries.
I don't know what the solution is, but I feel like we need to think about reworking a culture that keeps people from even starting, versus stripping away the complexity, because I agree that wine's complexity is also the thing that makes it interesting and exciting for those ready to get there. The problem lies in the fact that the culture stops a lot of people from even getting that far.
I recently saw a video on Instagram of a "somm" tasting a sparkling wine with her partner. He asked her if the grape was pinot noir, and she literally laughed in his face and responded in a way that clearly made him feel stupid for even bringing it up. When you can't even ask a simple question like that with your own partner (someone who supposedly cares about you) without being made to feel stupid, no wonder "normal people" feel intimidated to take that next step in wine. That shit is rampant in the wine industry.
"Recurring venereal disease" is an apt and excellent description for the August Syndrome and much more tactful than "seasonal tourettes" that I have used on occasion - and suffered from myself since 2013 as a Manchester United supporter. But as the great Sir Alex Ferguson would say, after a victory there's good reason to celebrate with a glass or two of decent red; after a loss there's even more reason for a few glasses.